What is supervision?

A working agreement between supervisor and practitioner during which the practitioner can discuss and reflect on their client work, receive feedback and, where appropriate, guidance.  

The term “Client” in the ASIS Ethical Codes refers to any person who pays for Member-Practitioner services, or acts as a Client for a Member-Practitioner who is in training, and includes individual Clients, workshop participants, online course participants, supervisees and mentees.




Benefits of supervision

Supervision provides a confidential space for you to:

  • share achievements and breakthroughs 

  • receive support for professional growth

  • reflect on your client interventions and on ways to improve professional effectiveness 

  • flag boundary slippage to prevent violation 

  • ask any questions about client sessions, workshops, or training events

  • highlight safeguarding issues / policies / risks 

  • raise concerns about any aspect of client relationship

  • explore instances of transference / counter-transference, including romantic / erotic transference 

  • create / support practitioner accountability 

  • receive constructive feedback about unconscious patterns and misjudged interventions 

  • identify collusion / blind spots 

  • creatively collaborate 

  • highlight where Continuous Professional Development would be useful 

  • be heard, acknowledged and validated  




Why supervision is essential

  • strive to provide the best possible service to clients 

  • supports  practitioners when they are setting up their practice and ongoing

  • practitioners are often working alone & confidentiality means that they  cannot openly discuss their  clients 

  • nature of the work - building relationship, power dynamic, intimate involvement for all parties

  • client work involves possibility of boundary violation and misuse of power

  • recognised (tried & tested) process for managing safety of clients and practitioners 

  • supports ethical conduct 

  • promotes self-reflection

  • provides the structure of a formal working relationship between supervisor and supervisee 

  • brings an objective perspective & experience 

  • helps to identify limits of practitioner competence & ensure practitioner is working within these limits 

  • fundamental component of practitioner self-care & ongoing professional development

  • mandatory requirement of ASIS Professional Membership 





ASIS recommendations for supervision 

Supervision is a requirement of Professional membership and applicants are asked to include their supervisor’s name on the application form. Point 8 of the ASIS Ethical Codes of Conduct states: “Professional Member-Practitioners are required to have regular supervision as a routine part of their practice to maintain their ability to serve clients ethically and effectively. This can be peer/group supervision and/or expert supervision or, optimally, both. Member-Practitioners agree to request supervision and guidance when experiencing ambiguity or difficulty with interpretation of what constitutes ethical behaviour. Member-Practitioners commit to their own self-care, personal growth, and continuing professional development (CPD).”

It is the responsibility of Members to ensure they meet the requirement and keep a personal log. If a Complaint was brought against a Member-Practitioner, ASIS may request proof of supervision. A member who does not meet the minimum supervision requirements would be in breach of the Ethical Codes and therefore their agreement as an ASIS Member.



Supervision frequency

Suggested frequency for supervision relates to the number of client sessions and applies to any professional work, including to one-on-one client work, teaching, workshops, and online programs etc.

The following table shows the recommended minimum frequency of supervision according to case load:

ASIS recommends that members retain a record of supervision and professional development. 

While the minimum number of supervision sessions per year is 3, ASIS strongly recommends supervision beyond the minimum and recognises that the case load of members (and the supervision requirement) varies considerably between members. 

How to find a supervisor 

At this stage we do not have specific criteria, however someone offering supervision to members should: 

  • have significant experience and knowledge of working in the field of sexology 

  • be supportive of somatic work 

  • have a good understanding of the role of supervisor 

  • we recommend that Member-Practitioners choose supervisors who are knowledgeable about working with diverse client groups e.g. awareness of Gender, Sex and Relationship Diversity (GSRD), neurodiversity, racial and cultural differences, and trauma-informed practice

People you could approach might include your teachers and trainers or reputable practitioners working in your field. Someone trained in supervision (which is a modality in its own right) may be appropriate too, however, be aware that supervisors who do not work hands-on may not be supportive of, nor understand, hands-on work.


Types of supervision

We recognise that ASIS members work in different ways so practitioners need to choose supervision options that best support their practice. Supervision may be in person or online, and can be provided by more than one supervisor and/or type of supervision. All of these are considered equally valid. 

Supervision options:

  1. One-to-one professional supervision 

  2. Professional group supervision

  3. Peer-led group supervision or one-to-one peer supervision 


Potential benefits & drawbacks of different types


One-to-one professional supervision 

One-to-one professional supervision benefits

  • Time that is focussed on you and what you want to explore

  • Only two people so easier to schedule 

  • A relationship with someone you have built trust with over time can be supportive in identifying blind spots as well as growth and development over time

  • Provides the structure of a formal working relationship between supervisor and supervisee 

  • Higher probability of receiving constructive feedback about unconscious patterns and misjudged interventions 

  • Receiving the perspective and wisdom of a highly experienced practitioner

One-to-one professional supervision drawbacks

  • Can be unhelpful or detrimental if there is not a good fit between supervisor and supervisee 

  • Can be difficult to find someone who you want to work with, who is supportive of somatic sexology and who is available 

  • Financial investment can be an obstacle 


​​Professional group supervision

Professional group supervision benefits

  • Professional facilitation brings structure and focus 

  • May focus on a single modality or graduates of a single training organisation 

  • Potential to learn about different types of practitioners, different ways of working and/or receive feedback from a variety of points of view

  • Opportunity to keep up to date with developments in your field and allied fields 

  • Lower financial investment than 1-2-1 supervision

  • Having the experience of being a contributing member of a supervision group

  • Group dynamics should be managed by the supervisor (unlike peer supervision)

Professional group supervision drawbacks

  • There is less time per person so can be a less depth compared to 1-on-1 supervision

  • May focus on a single modality or graduates of a single training organisation 


Peer-led group (and one-to-one peer) supervision

Peer-led group supervision benefits

  • Building network of professionals for community building, support & referrals 

  • Exposure to (and learn about) different types of practitioners, different ways of working

  • Receive a variety of feedback points of view

  • Opportunity to keep up to date with developments in your field and allied fields 

  • Recognition that you are not alone in encountering certain client situations 

  • The opportunity to share tips & resources 

  • Low or no financial investment

  • Having the experience of being a contributing member of a supervision group

Peer-led group supervision drawbacks

  • Reluctance to challenge and call-in colleagues can lead to collusion 

  • There is less time per person so can be a less depth compared to 1-on-1 supervision

  • Requires creation of and adherence to agreed parameters - respect for others and the group process

  • Dependant on participants - the quality of feedback will be a reflection of others’ levels of experience and expertise 

  • There can be a lack of commitment & focus

  • Group dynamics can interrupt learning 

  • Can be difficult to coordinate schedule and higher chance of no-shows

Some peer group supervision resources:



Supervision Agreements

It is important to agree the scope and terms of any supervision. Some of the key points to consider in making a Supervision Agreement include: 

  • What is the focus of the supervision?

  • The structure of the sessions

  • Frequency & location of sessions

  • Terms of confidentiality

  • Boundaries and dual relationships

  • Supervision fees & payment terms 

  • Access to supervision outside of booked sessions

  • Cancellation & termination of supervision agreement 



Supervision and Complaints

In the event of a complaint or other proceeding against a member, the ASIS Board or others may request evidence of supervision and professional development and may contact the member’s supervisor if required.